Comparing Henrik Ibsens Enemy of the People and Kurt Vonneguts Slaugh

intelligence, engineering acquirement and Human Values in Henrik Ibsens Enemy of the People and Kurt Vonneguts Slaughterhouse-FiveEvery daytime I use applied science and science, from the allergy pill I contract to my cell phone and my Apple watch, technology is a vital conk out of my day. Are the human values of integrity, honesty and kindness a grapheme of my everyday life, though? Everyone wants to believe they be a tidy person, further there are so many things in life that arent good or positive at all, it is apparent that people-who want to think they are good-do mean things. Some of the worst things are done with some of the opera hat intentions, with the idea that the ends justify the means. Science can improve several things, resembling ones life expectancy, but can it improve the quality of life? Science without morals to support it can be a dangerous thing. This is seen in several of the works we have read this semester, including Henrik Ibsens Enemy of t he People and Kurt Vonneguts Slaughterhouse-Five. In Enemy of the People, we see that science and technology are at the mercy of those who hold power, in this case, political power. Dr. Stockmann has discovered, through the use of science, that there is a problem with the economic center of the town-the baths. It is non Dr. Stockmanns use of science that questions the compatibility of science and human values, but his bother, Peter Stockmanns use of technology. Peter is able to falsify the newspaper, and therefore popular opinion, away from Dr. Stockmann (Act 3). The newspaper is a form of technology that allows news of many events to reach the common person. However, this holds a lot of tariff with it. Whoever is in charge of what goes in the paper has the ability to shape humankind opi... ... difficult to include morals in decision-making. It is so much simpler not to think of the consequences of ones actions. However, if everyone were to do this, society would quick ly disband. People need to vary thinking of their actions as having consequences that affect more than just themselves, and that they must donjon this in mind when making decisions. Critical thinking is difficult, and its not the almost pleasant thing, but as Plato has Socrates say in the Apology, The unexamined life is not worth living (West & West, 92). Unless we incorporate human values into science and technology, we ordain be living a life not worth living. whole shebang Cited Lippmann, Walter. The Public Philosophy. New Brunswick Transaction Publishers, 2000.West, Grace S., Thomas West. Texts on Socrates Plato and Aristophanes. Ithaca Cornell University Press, 1998.