Capital Punishment, Death Penalty - What Are We Waiting For? :: Argumentative Persuasive Essays

Capital Punishment Essays What Are We delay For? execution prevents eighteen murders per year.(Hirsch, 122)         Opponents argue that capital penalization is immoral.  But if you look outthe Old Testament, it is moral.  In one passage from Genesis, Whoever sheds theblood of world, by man shall his blood be shed.  Another from Exodus, Eye for aneye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, arouse for burn, wound forwound, stripe for stripe (Samaha, 440).  It was not very moral of the captiveto commit a murder in the first place.  Why should it be immoral to execute aprisoner, but moral to kill an fair person.  It is as morally in good order topunish culpables for their wicked deeds as it is to praise heroes for theirheroic deeds.  If it is noble for soldiers to give their lives for their countryin war epoch, thusly it is morally right to claim the lives of murderers for killing blameless people in pe aceable society(Samaha, 441).  According to ProfessorErnest van den Haag  The life of individually man should be sacred to each other man...it is not sufficient to proclaim the sacredness and inviolability of human life.  Itmust be secured as well, by menacing with the loss of their own life thosewho violate what has been proclaimed as inviolable-the right of innocents tolive (Haag, 67).         Other opponents argue that there is the chance of executing an innocentprisoner.  Hugo Adam Bedu and Michael L. Radelet collected evidence of everycapital punishment racing shell after the 1930s.  They concluded that 23 innocentpeople, out of several metre cases in the twentieth century, were convictedand executed,  but all of these mistakes were made because there was a forcedconfession, suppression of evidence, and  perjury (Samaha 442).  That means notone of these persons was in truth innocent they just had bad lawyers, or nolawyers when they had their trial.  The last time a truly innocent person wasexecuted was before the 1930s.         The biggest debate for capital punishment is retribution.  The victimsfamily often feels relieved when the prisoner has been executed.  Retributionsatisfies the strike for justice. It channels public outrage into the acceptableform of the criminal sentence.  If criminal sentences do not satisfy this demandfor justice, angry citizens may recede respect for law and even, on occasion, takeit into their own hands (Samaha, 414).  The punishment handed out should fitthe crime connected, if a murder is committed then he or she deserves to beexecuted.  The best solution to the difficulty is to execute the prisoner right