Kant vs. Mill Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Kant vs. Mill - Essay ExampleIn some other words, he says that one must suffice in a manner that one would expect others to act towards oneself. This Kantian ethical theory is touristy because it is widely respected and consequently upheld by others.Mills greatest happiness principle widely know as utilitarianism is fundament exclusivelyy focused on the consequences of actions taken. He believed in the philosophy that actions, which result in utmost happiness for maximum number of population, are invariable good and therefore, the end justifies the means if it generates happiness for sight. Popularised as act utilitarian theory, the actions, that are designed to benefit or have beneficial cascading effects on others, are morally and ethically right. Bentham propagates Mills theory and says when choosing a course of action, one should always nibble the one that will maximize happiness and minimize unhappiness for the greatest number of masses (Bentham from Rosenstand p.176).I agree with Kant that trash should not be thrown out of the car window on the motorway primarily because Kant is quite vociferous on the issue that respect for others must become part of our actions and people must act appropriately. Throwing trash not only promotes the bad habit of scattering trash all over the place, even if it is a freeway, but it also violates the law of the state that encourages cleanliness, good habits amongst the citizens and ensures safety of other road users. Despite being a freeway, the people must ensure that their acts do not evil the other people and throwing trash out of the window could inadvertently hurt people who could be spillage by.Mills response to the issue is ridiculous because although cleaning lanes does provide employment to a segment of the people but at the same time, deliberately throwing trash would hurt the sensibilities of a lot more people It must be understood that people are living within a defined parameters of a social framework . Hence, well being of