The Changing Role and Status of women in Britain since 1900 – source related study

1. fount A is useful as it shows how get together the Suffr be onttes were in 1908. It says in the caption beneath the photograph, that there was said to necessitate been 200000 tidy sum who attended. They look like they are determined to get what they want. or so of the wo workforce are holding banners, flowers and flags. at that place is a policeman in the shoetree of the picture. This shows that the police thought that the protest might become violent. The Suffragettes were known for barracking at meetings, deliberately trying to get arrested and get sent to prison, and in 1908 they began to attack properties. The Suffragettes believed that peaceful campaigns were getting them nowhere. In 1908, women had already achieved many improvements in their education, legal counterbalances and job opportunities.However they still wanted to earn the right to be satisfactory to vote in General Elections. This may be what the protest was for. The Suffragettes had a lot of support, pa rticularly in London. There were xxxiv branches of the WSPU in London al peerless and fifty-four branches in the rest of the republic. Source A shows that the Suffragettes are like a big team and family. They all(a) look determined to get what they want. The WSPUs motto was Deeds not Words, this meant that they believed that actions were stronger than words.Emmeline Pankhurst is hint the protest. In the Suffragettes first public demonstration in 1905 Emmeline said, Then amid uproar and shouting, the women were seized and flung out of the hall. In conclusion this source shows that the Suffragettes were a strong convocation of women who had strong opinions and views. This source shows that the Suffragette movement was a strong force to be reckoned with thus affecting quite a littles attitudes. There would be those people in spacious support, with many women openly and many offering passive support. Mens attitudes would be very different. Up until now the womens place was in the home. The polices attitude was one of recognition of their considerable power and they feared the implications of this, thus the police presence in Source A suggests the need for containment and prevention of violence.2. Source D and E are both extremely useful in showing us what peoples views nigh the Suffragettes were in 1910. Source D is taken from a British newspaper, and is obviously written by a man. It is reliable to show the some(a) peoples opinions of what the Suffragettes were doing at the time. Source E is alike useful as it is a postcard that was issued by the Suffragettes. It shows the suffragettes opinion. The postcard would be used to persuade people to become one of them. It shows what women could be a mayor or a nurse, and cant vote however men could be lunatics or drunkards and they can vote. This is dark as it has been created by the suffragettes, and is very one sided. However Source D is also sloped as it doesnt show the views of the suffragettes, only the writers view about what went on.In Source D the writer uses phrases such as mordant recklessness and desperate women to show how the country should be ashamed of the way the suffragettes bear acted. This newspaper article does not once say why the suffragettes were doing what they were doing. Im current many people agreed with what was written however I am also sure a lot of people were against what was written. In the advertise it says DISGRACEFUL SCENES Reckless Women Charge Headlong into Cordon of Police. The word disgraceful suggests that the country should be ashamed of the actions of the Suffragettes. Men expected women to be quiet and obedient so when women started to rebel against this stereotype, the campaign for womens votes was important news, especially with the papers. The Suffragettes began to create posters, which got them some humanity from people in the public.In Source E it says What a cleaning lady may be and yet not give way the Vote. Underneath, it has p ictures of women being a mayor, a nurse, a doctor, teacher and a factory hand. It also says what a man may put one across been and yet not lose the vote. Underneath, it has pictures of men being a convict, a lunatic, an owner of white slaves, being high-risk for service and a drunkard. Of course, women could also be all of the things the males are, and the males are able to have all of the livings the females have however in this postcard the women have only been shown as being good things, whereas the men have been shown as being bad. This would have got the suffragettes some more support.In conclusion I believe that both sources are equally reliable. They both are biased and they both show different opinions of different people at the time.3. When the initial World War began so many men had gone away(p) to fight, that women were needed to do their jobs. This meant that the number of women working in industry change magnitude massively. The contend made it acceptable for wome n to work in shipyards, collieries and brickyards. Some of them worked as highly expert engineers and carpenters. In some of these jobs, women were welcomed, however in others they were resented because they had petty(a) or no training for jobs, which had previously needed very skilled people.If there was an election during the war most soldiers wouldnt be able to vote. Women briefly realised that this could be their chance to pressurize the government to let them vote. There were no demonstrations, however there were many meetings between womens leaders and politicians and telegrams and earn were sent to MPs. In 1918 Parliament passed a new jurisprudence, which allowed women over the age of 30 to be able to vote.From my knowledge of what happened, I believe that the war was a big part of Parliament passing a law allowing women to vote. As there may not of been enough males in the country at the time of the war, to vote if there was an election, they needed females. I also thin k that because most men were away during the war, the women proved themselves to be useful, as they started doing work in factories and so on. Men had never seen females do this earlier so it may have been a shock to them to see that women could do things just as good as them. In Source J, Herbert Asquith says, I will find it impossible to withhold from women the power and the right of making their voices heard. This proves that women proved themselves by working while the men were away at war. They even convinced an ex prime minister that they were worthy of having a say about what goes on in there life.The war didnt succor the French Suffragette women gain the vote.In conclusion I do agree with the statement Without the First World War British women would not have gained the right to vote in 1918. I also believe that women would not have received as much respect from men as they do today if the war hadnt of happened. Women had a chance to prove to people that they were able to d o things just as well as men in this period of time.